Abstract
This paper shows how the archive of Indian constitutional history limits access to constitutional disagreement. It attempts an alternative framing of the issue of political safeguards for religious minorities (‘the communal question’) as a triangle of disagreement among the Sikhs, the Anglo‑Indians, and Sardar Vallabhbhai Jhaverbhai Patel. However, the task is complicated by the silence in the official archives on all three actors. If, as critical historians argue, silence is the very condition of the archive and the writing of history, this paper argues that the historian must ‘sieve’ the inevitably silent archives of Indian constitutional history for perturbations, follow metaphors, and engage in critical, informed speculation.
Recommended Citation
Gauba, Kanika
(2024)
"Sieving Silence: The Communal Question and the Archive of Indian Constitutional History,"
National Law School Journal: Vol. 18:
Iss.
1, Article 1.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.55496/CZHJ5239
Available at:
https://repository.nls.ac.in/nlsj/vol18/iss1/1
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
https://doi.org/10.55496/CZHJ5239
Included in
Constitutional Law Commons, Intellectual History Commons, Law and Politics Commons, Legal History Commons, Political History Commons, Social History Commons