•  
  •  
 

Abstract

In April 1988, a writ petition challenging the constitutional validity of the Commission of Sati Prevention Act, 1987 " was filed in the Supreme Court by the Akhil Bharat Varshiya Dharma Sangh. 3 The main legal contention of the petitioner was that the impugned Central Act, which made the glorification of sati an offence punishable with a specified term of imprisonment, was violative of the fundamental rights of persons (professing the Hindu religion) relating to freedom of speech and expression, 3 freedom of conscience and free practise and propagation of religion' and the equality clause® under the Constitution.

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.