Abstract
Sec.34 of the I.P.C. has been construed as a rule of evidence to pin liability on each of those with a common intention for the acts of all of them. The case reviewed here seeks to depart from this rule. This could upset the established jurisprudence in this field, and the authors of this judgment have been either oblivious or reckless as to the consequences of this judgment.
Recommended Citation
Rajamani, Lavanya
(1994)
"Rama Meru
v. State of Gujarat,
1993 Supp (1) SCC 315.,"
National Law School of India Review: Vol. 6:
Iss.
1, Article 16.
Available at:
https://repository.nls.ac.in/nlsir/vol6/iss1/16
COinS
