Abstract
The aim of this article is to engage in a critical comparison of the legal regimes that the United States and India use to implement and enforce their competition laws. In Part I, the author describes the U.S. institutions that play major roles in implementing and enforcing competition law, including their powers, their staffing, and the procedures they use to announce policies and to adjudicate disputes. In Part II, the author seeks to critically evaluate the working of competition law in the United States. In Part III, the author describes the Indian institutions that implement and enforce competition law, including their powers, their staffing and the procedures they use to announce policies and to adjudicate disputes. In Part IV, the author applies evaluative criteria to Indian law that he has to U.S. law in an attempt to compare the two regimes.
Recommended Citation
Pierce Jr., Richard J.
(2022)
"Comparing the Competition Law Regimes of the United States and India,"
National Law School of India Review: Vol. 29:
Iss.
1, Article 4.
Available at:
https://repository.nls.ac.in/nlsir/vol29/iss1/4
