Abstract
The author argues that arbitration in India has been plagued by many of the same troubles as litigation. Arbitration proceedings are often time consuming and expensive. The author believes that the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is flawed, in that it perceives a role for the court at various stages. The similarity of arbitration with litigation is striking. In making these arguments, the author calls for a rethink of the commonly held view that arbitration, as an alternative to litigation, is free from the negatives that litigation is associated with.
Recommended Citation
Sondhi, Aditya
(2007)
"Arbitration in India - Some Myth Dispelled,"
National Law School of India Review: Vol. 19:
Iss.
2, Article 4.
Available at:
https://repository.nls.ac.in/nlsir/vol19/iss2/4
