•  
  •  
 

Abstract

When faced with a repudiatory breach of contract, parties may either terminate the contract or seek its specific performance. The latter choice acquired newfound significance following the 2018 amendment to the Specific Relief Act, which marked a decisive shift away from treating specific performance as a discretionary remedy, establishing it instead as a rule. This paper examines how courts have grappled with this change. It reveals a doctrinal split between one line of jurisprudence, that continues to scrutinize claimants’ conduct and refuse to enforce contracts on a discretionary basis, and another that nominally embraces the new statutory framework, but carves out exceptions and grants compensatory remedies to defendants. While this paper argues that the latter approach falls short of securing contracting parties’ performance interest, it nonetheless represents a step towards the judicial adoption of the fundamental change in India’s contractual remedies framework.

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.